Baroness Andrews: My honourable friend the Minister for Housing and Planning has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am today setting out further details of the Government's implementation strategy and dry run for home information packs (HIPs).
	The aims of the HIPs programme
	The aims of the Government's reforms to the home buying and selling process are threefold:
	To provide home owners with important energy efficiency information about their homes to help them cut fuel bills and carbon emissions. This is vital as homes account for 27 per cent of Britain's carbon emissions. Energy performance certificates will provide clear information about the energy efficiency of homes and how that can be improved. The Energy Saving Trust estimates that following the advice in energy performance certificates could save the average home owner up to £300 a year on their fuel bills The Government believe it is important to implement these as early as possible given the importance of reducing carbon emissions.To benefit consumers by cutting waste and duplication, speeding up home sales and reducing the number of failed transactions, which at present cost consumers around £350 million a year in wasted costs.To encourage and support long-term transformation of the home buying and selling industry by introducing greater transparency and competition to drive down costs and incentivise better service and clearer redress for consumers.
	Testing
	There are three main components to home information packs: searches and other legal documents; energy performance certificates; and the home condition surveys that make up the other component of a full home condition report. It is essential that all aspects of home information packs are properly tested before full implementation. We need to be sure that consumers understand, value and can utilise the information that HIPs provide; that the assumed benefits will be realised; and that the different operating systems underpinning HIPs will work effectively.
	As part of our ongoing programme of implementation, we have already successfully tested more than 14,000 HIPs with searches, but largely without home condition reports, in the dry run so far. Over the course of the summer we propose to undertake further consumer research on home condition reports; to study in greater detail the 250 HIPs that have been produced to date with some kind of survey; and to look to see what more we can learn from experience in other countries where HIPs have been introduced successfully or are currently being proposed. From the autumn the emphasis of our implementation programme will switch to the testing of energy performance certificates and home condition reports. Working with the industry and with consumers, we are proposing to support a series of area-based trials and we will test proposals such as allowing sellers to start marketing their homes if they have already commissioned their HIP rather than having to wait up to 14 days. There will be independent assessment and monitoring of all aspects of the dry run.
	Roll out
	It is also important that reforms are introduced on a timetable and as part of a programme that maximises the benefits for consumers and the environment. As part of the development of the dry run, we have engaged in detailed consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and have gathered substantial information on the progress of implementation so far. As a result, we have concluded that there would be significant risks and potential disadvantages to consumers from a mandatory "big bang" introduction of full home condition reports on 1 June 2007. In particular:
	Further testing is needed to ensure that home condition reports deliver the assumed benefits for consumers and that the operating systems that support them work smoothly. Design work on the dry run has made it clear that this cannot be completed in time for the results to be taken into account in by 1 June.A recent report from the Council of Mortgage Lenders identified the real possibility that some lenders might not be fully geared up to use HCRs until 2008-09. In particular the industry's plans for bringing in automated valuation models means that many lenders will not have them in place by June 2007 and so will continue to seek separate mortgage valuation surveys where they could have relied on a home condition report.There are concerns about the number of inspectors that will be in place in time for June next year.
	Moreover, because of our commitment to addressing climate change we do not want to jeopardise the successful introduction of energy performance certificates at the earliest possible opportunity by pursuing the "big bang" mandatory introduction of full home condition reports at the same time.
	We believe that progressive market-led take-up of full HCRs could strongly benefit consumers. Bearing in mind our commitment to the early introduction of energy performance certificates, combining an energy performance certificate and a full home condition report at the same time is likely to offer significant additional benefits to buyers and sellers. In particular, sellers offering full home condition reports should be more likely to benefit from swifter sales and suffer fewer transaction failures, as accepted offers are much less likely to be re-opened as a result of new information coming to light. In addition, once automated valuation models are in place, home condition reports should mean buyers get cheaper and swifter valuations and mortgage offers. We therefore believe that there will be a significant incentive for consumers to top up their HIPs voluntarily to include full home condition reports and that this is a product that the market can and should deliver.
	Therefore we have concluded that:
	HIPs will be introduced with searches and other key documents from 1 June 2007.Energy performance certificates will be included in HIPs on a mandatory basis from 1 June 2007.We will work with the industry to facilitate market-led take-up of full HCRs. As part of this approach, we will explore with the sector a wide range of options to enable a successful and innovative market for HCRs, including options for supporting the provision of necessary systems, effective demonstration projects for HCRs, and will consider the case for pump-priming funding. This market-led approach has the added benefit of giving industry more flexibility to innovate and adapt to consumer preferences. This means that the remaining aspects of home condition reports will not be made mandatory from June next year, but HCRs will be authorised documents that sellers will be able to include in their packs.Mandatory HCRs will remain on the table if the industry fails to make a success of the roll out of HCRs.
	As part of the next phase of reform of we will also be setting out our plans for an ombudsman scheme for estate agents to strengthen consumer protection as well as further proposals to review competition and transparency in the industry to the benefit of consumers.
	We believe that these arrangements will ensure that home information packs are implemented in a way that maximises benefits for consumers and the environment and successfully enables the long-term transformation of the home buying and selling market.

Lord Drayson: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence (Des Browne) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I would like to confirm the details of the force package that we currently plan to deploy to Iraq at the next routine roulement of UK forces in November 2006.
	The lead UK formation, currently 20 Armoured Brigade, will be replaced by 19 Light Brigade, which will take over command of UK forces in early November. In addition to 19 Light Brigade's Headquarters and Signals squadron, the other major units currently in Iraq will be replaced as follows.
	
		
			 Unit deploying for Operation TELIC 9 Unit currently in theatre (Operation TELIC) 
			 HQ 19 Light Brigade HQ 20 Armoured Brigade 
			 1 x squadron from 2nd Royal Tank Regiment The Queen's Royal Hussars 
			 The Queen's Royal Lancers 1st The Queens' Dragoon Guards 
			 1st Battalion The King's Regiment 1st Battalion The Light Infantry 
			 1st Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment 1st Battalion The Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment 
			 1st Battalion The Royal Green Jackets 1st Battalion The Devonshire and Dorset Light Infantry 
			 1st Battalion The Staffordshire Regiment 2nd Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment 
			 1 x company from the Joint CBRN Regiment and 1 x company from The Black Watch 3rd Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland  
			 1 x company from the 51st Highland, 7th Battalion the Royal Regiment of Scotland (Territorial Army) 1 x company from each of The King's and Cheshire Regiment (Territorial Army) and The Lancastrian and Cumbrian Volunteers (Territorial Army) 
			 40th Regiment Royal Artillery 26th Regiment Royal Artillery 
			 2 x companies of the 2nd Battalion The Light Infantry (to deploy in September) 1st Battalion The Grenadier Guards (to return in September) 
			 38 Engineer Regiment 35 Engineer Regiment 
			 19 Lt Bde Combat Service Support Battalion 1 Logistics Corps 
		
	
	Following the completion of the roulement in November, the total number of UK troops in Iraq will be broadly the same as currently deployed, approximately 7,100 service men and women.
	Members of the Reserve Forces will continue to deploy to Iraq as part of this force package, and we shall shortly start to serve approximately 600 call-out notices in order to fill some 500 posts. On completion of their mobilisation procedures, the reservists will undertake a period of training and integration into their respective receiving units. For the majority, their deployment to theatre will also commence in November and most will serve there for six to seven months, although some may have shorter tours. The reservists will perform a wide range of activities including force protection duties, logistics, medical support and individual reinforcements to units. In addition, we expect some 20 members of the Sponsored Reserves to be in theatre at any one time.
	I emphasise that the force package we deploy in October/November will depend on the conditions on the ground, in particular the security situation in the south and progress on handover of security responsibility to the Iraqi civil authorities over the months to come. I very much hope that positive progress in these areas will enable adjustments to the force package we deploy, and we will continue to keep UK force levels in Iraq under review. I will, of course, aim to inform Parliament of any changes to these plans at the earliest opportunity.

Lord Warner: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Ivan Lewis) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	We acknowledge that there are pressures with regard to the waiting times for audiology services. Considerable progress has been made in improving the provision of audiology services although we accept that there is still some way to go.
	Between 2000-05 this Government invested £125 million in the Modernising Hearing Aids Service programme (MHAS), which was managed by the Royal National Institute for the Deaf (RNID), on behalf of the Department of Health. The outcomes of the programme have been significant and have ensured that by 2005 all NHS hearing aid services met the Government target of routinely fitting modem digital hearing aids.
	There have been other significant improvements:
	working with RNID, we have ensured that high quality digital hearing aids are now available throughout the NHS with an estimated 750,000 people fitted with digital hearing aids by the NHS;the current public/private partnership (PPP) is also proving very successful; by February 2006 approximately 68,600 patients had been fitted with a hearing aid. NHS trusts benefit from the increased capacity, competitive pricing and quality of service provision available through PPP;RNID and NHS Purchasing and Supplies Agency (PASA) working together have negotiated a reduction in the cost to the NHS of digital hearing aids;a new degree has been developed to help address the national shortage of audiologists;"Hearing Direct" has been set up—12 sites run by NHS Direct which provide follow-up care and advice for selected hearing aid users (may be suitable for one-third of all NHS patients); andsince January 2006 we have been collecting waiting time and activity data for 15 diagnostic tests and procedures, including pure-tone audiometry. These data have been shared with the NHS, for performance management purposes since 2 June 2006. The data were published on 12 July 2006.
	A key area of challenge to delivering the 18-week waiting target outlined in section two of the publication, Tackling hospital waiting: the 18-week patient pathway—An implementation framework,was audiology. Work is underway at official level to scope a national action plan for audiology, to be published in due course. The intention is to develop and take the work forward in partnership with stakeholders. This will involve working with eight physiological measurement sites to test ideas and to improve access to physiological measurement diagnostic services, including audiology. These sites will be critical to inform the action plan and its eventual implementation.
	The Government's investment, through the work of MHAS, has improved outcomes for patients. Medical Research Council research shows that patients have reported a 40 per cent increase in benefit with the new service.

Lord Davies of Oldham: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Transport (Dr Stephen Ladyman) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	The department is to release guidance on appraisal and modelling for local road pricing schemes. The guidance will advise scheme promoters in their preparation of business cases involving road pricing and can be found in the consultation section of the department's transport analysis guidance website at www.webtag.org.uk. The guidance has been placed in the Libraries of the House.
	An overview of the analysis of road pricing schemes is provided by "Introduction to Modelling and Appraisal for Road Pricing". This is supported by four other modules for analysts: "Designing Efficient Local Road Pricing Schemes" (TAG Unit 3.12.1), which discusses approaches to the design of effective road pricing schemes; guidance on the issues arising when modelling road pricing schemes is provided in "Modelling Road Pricing" (TAG Unit 3.12.2); guidance on the issues arising when appraising road pricing schemes is provided in "Appraisal of Road Pricing Options" (TAG Unit 3.12.3); and "Measuring the Social and Distributional Impacts of Road Pricing Schemes" (TAG Unit 3.12.4) provides guidance on the use of social research methods to assess the social and distributional impacts of road pricing.
	During the consultation period, ending 1 October, the department welcomes comments. The guidance will be kept under review and may be updated from time to time to reflect any comments made.

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My right honourable friend the Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In his report on the Review of HMRC Online Services, published at the Budget in March 2006, Lord Carter of Coles recommended that, for 2007-08 and subsequent returns, the income tax self-assessment filing deadline should be brought forward from31 January to 30 September for paper returns and to 30 November for returns filed over the internet. Lord Carter has since reviewed the responses to the partial regulatory impact assessment published with his report and has received further representations from tax practitioners. Having reviewed his earlier findings, he has now recommended that, for 2007-08 and subsequent returns, the filing period for paper returns should be reduced to seven months—the new deadline should be 31 October—and the filing period for online returns should remain at 10 months—with a deadline of 31 January. He has also suggested that HM Revenue and Customs officials should work with practitioners to explore how in future the practical difficulties in collecting data earlier might be overcome so that taxpayers can complete their returns sooner if they wish. The Government have accepted Lord Carter's revised recommendation. This updating of the self-assessment system takes account of both the views of tax professionals and the operational requirements of HM Revenue and Customs.

Lord Davies of Oldham: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Douglas Alexander) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	The accessibility of our cities is key to their economic growth and success. It is therefore important that local authorities take responsibility for addressing the problem of road congestion and the impact on journey times caused by the increasing numbers of journeys being made.
	Each of the 10 largest urban areas in England, therefore, has a target to limit the increase in person journey time per mile, given the expected increase in travel over the next five years. The target relates to the overall average journey time on a representative set of the busiest roads in each of their major urban centres. The 10 are: London, Greater Manchester, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne are Wear, Merseyside, Bristol, Nottingham and Leicester.
	While ownership of these local targets, and implementing measures to deliver them, is the responsibility of the local authorities involved, we have weighted (according to traffic volumes) and averaged the journey times across the 10 areas to create a national composite PSA target for the Department for Transport, as we announced on 5 July 2005.
	The national PSA target is therefore that:
	By 2010-11, the 10 largest urban areas will meet the congestion targets set in their local transport plan relating to movement on main roads into city centres. The target will be deemed to have been met if, on target routes in the 10 largest urban areas in England, an average increase in travel of 4.5 per cent is accommodated within an increase of 3.7 per cent in person journey time per mile. The local targets on which this is based include:in London, accommodate an increase in travel of3 per cent within an increase in journey time of no more than 1.5 per cent;in Manchester, accommodate an increase in travel of 1.5 per cent with no increase in journey time; andin the West Midlands, accommodate an increase in travel of 4 per cent within an increase in journey time of no more than 5 per cent (the target is expected to change—possibly to 3 per cent if funding for the West Midland's urban traffic management and control project is fully approved in 2006-07).
	Each local authority is responsible for finding a balance between economic development, safety and journey times consistent with local circumstances and needs. The targets for each area are consistent with each authority's local transport plans, which set out their wider transport strategies. The Department for Transport will be working with each authority to encourage and support them in delivery.
	London, Manchester and the West Midlands account for about two-thirds of the traffic in the10 urban areas. Major scheme bids, including for the West Midland's urban traffic management and control project, are currently being considered.
	We have today published a PSA technical note, with full methodological details, on the Department for Transport website. Copies have been placed in Library of the House.